home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Walter (Jay) Turberville (wturber@primenet.com) wrote:
- : In article <3lpgcb$q4b@geraldo.cc.utexas.edu> bcromain@mail.utexas.edu (Byron Romain) writes:
- : >From: bcromain@mail.utexas.edu (Byron Romain)
- : >Subject: Why not OS/2
- : >Date: 3 Apr 1995 18:56:11 GMT
-
- : My guesses:
-
- : They wrote LW for Win32s which means:
-
- : 1) You can run it under Windows, NT, or possibly OS/2
-
- Under os/2 with a little over head...
-
- : 2) Minor changes allow you to port it to non-Intel based Windows NT machines.
- : This is possible because Windows NT is a cross-platform OS. LW should also run
- : on the upcoming Windows 9X.
-
- : 3) Windows just happens to be the single most popular OS in the world and is
- : likely continue to hold that title.
-
- Only because all the apps exsist for windows... but if people are so
- dissatified with Bill (the cool rich guy) Gates... then why continue to
- support windows???
-
- : _________________________________________________________________
- : Walter (Jay) Turberville |wturber@primenet.com wturber@aol.com
- : Phoenix, AZ |http://www.primenet.com/~wturber
- : ...........................|ftp.primenet.com/users/w/wturber
-
- You're on all the newgroups I read! <grin>
-
-
-
-
- --
- --G0w3
- --Life isn't like a friggin box of chocolates you retard!
- you know what's inside... it says it on the package!
-
-
-
-